According to {John 13:34-35 }, at his last meal with his disciples, Jesus
gave his followers this important instruction:
that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another." |
|
How can the Roman Catholic Church imagine that it represents Jesus Christ when - instead of setting an example of loving others, it has a many centuries old record of promoting contempt for all kinds of people ? Today it's homosexuals. Before them, it was the Jews, (which led to the Nazi Holocaust, in a country that was 99% "Christian"). Before them, it was "heathen savages". Before them, women accused of being "witches". Before them, questioning Catholics (or "heretics") for whom the Church created the inquisition, and Moslems, which inspired its military "crusades".
Is that kind of behavior what Jesus intended |
![]()
Even though only a 25% minority of the U.S. population belong to the Roman Catholic Church, because many of its members are so well situated and/or have spouses who are well situated in high offices in the land, and throughout American society, they have now secured not only 5 out of 9 seats of the U.S. Supreme Court, but key positions in every other important sector of society. See Catholic celebrities throughout civil society.
"For, they (the lawfully established clergy of his time) preach but do not practice. They pile up back-breaking burdens and lay them on other men's shoulders -- yet they themselves will not so much as raise a finger to move them. Their whole lives are planned with an eye to effect. They increase the size of their prayer books and lengthen the tassels of their robes; they love seats of honor at public functions and front places and to have men call them "rabbi" or "teacher".
"Sixtus IV was the first pope to license the brothels of Rome; they brought him in thirty thousand ducats a year (roughly the yearly income of 30 common laborers). He also gained considerably from a tax imposed on priests who kept a mistress. Another source of income was granting privileges to rich men 'to enable them to solace certain matrons in the absence of their husbands.'
|
|
What do YOU think Jesus would say about
|
|
|
|
What do YOU think Jesus would say about
|
|
What do YOU think Jesus would say about
|
|
The Catholics in the pews haven't shared much of the blame in the past for what their Church did, because they knew so little about what went on in their church and would have been powerless to do anything about the behavior of their priests, bishops of popes anyway. But "the times they are a changin' ". To the extent that, in democratic countries, at least, Catholic lay people are recognizing that paying all the bills gives them at least some voice in their church, they are gaining in responsibility as well. "My church right of wrong" is just as unwise and immoral when practiced by lay people as it is when practiced by bishops. And a church with bishops willing to protect priests who mollest innocent children is capable of harboring other immorality as well.
Given the choice to identify with the humanity of the victims, or to identify with the victimizers who shared their own Catholic faith, how sad it is that for so many Catholics, their church affiliation trumps their humanity, and they feel compelled to defend the victimizers. I invite sincere Catholics to join me in speaking on behalf of the victims of their church. By understanding and appreciating how and why their church has mistreated so many in the distant as well as the recent past, they will better understand how and why their church is doing much the same thing today to different victims as it has done to so many so often in the past. We may pray, as Jesus did, "Forgive them, Lord, for they know not what they do." But we dare not forget Jesus' crucial prediction of the Final Judgment, where he warned that he would judge us all on the basis of what we did in our lives to our brothers and sisters.
|
| to scandals in the Church? For Thomas Aquinas, following the thinking of Aristotle, anger is a necessary element of the virtue of fortitude: "fortitude isn't a matter of just putting up with evil, or of enduring sorrow, but includes actively resisting evil, bravery in the struggle, and anger at the evil which has led to sorrow (over some evil occurence). Summa Theologica, IIa-IIae, Q. 123, Art. 10. St. Thomas affirmed that “wrath is a necessary and positive part of human nature,” and “the lack of wrath against injustice is a deficiency.” |
|
"In 1965 there were 42,000 young men in American seminaries studying for the priesthood. Today ( actually in 1997) there are fewer than 6000, even though there are 50% more Catholics. One half of all American priests quit the priesthood before reaching retirement age due to this loss of credibility of the institution itself. There are now over 20,000 ex-priests. The Vatican now regards America as a missionary region. Younger priests from Eastern Europe, Africa, Asia and Latin America are being brought in to protect Papal interests because American men are shunning the priesthood. The average age of nuns in the United States is 65 years. Only 3% are under age 40 while 35% are older than age 70. The number of Catholic general hospitals is down 22% since 1960. Only 28% of Catholics attend Mass on a typical Sunday while 30 years ago Mass attendance was more than 70%. Catholics contribute only 1.1% of their income to the church, while Protestants contribute 2.2%. Twenty years ago they gave about the same. " See this excellent LA Times article by Robert Scheer on Blame Church Arrogance, Not Oversexed Society.
Contrast the above with the laughable article below:
In Sept., 2008, Pope Benedict XVI went to Paris and according to an A.P. report, "Paraphrasing from the New Testament, Benedict decried 'insatiable greed' and said 'the love of money is the root of all evil.' 'Have not money, the thirst for possessions, for power and even knowledge, diverted man from his true destiny?' the pope asked. In his homily, Benedict blasted modern society’s thirst for these new 'pagan' idols as a 'scandal, a real plague.'
|
| It appears that a now retired Australian bishop is stepping forward to say at least some of what I say on this web site about the R. C. church. Bishop Geoffrey Robinson is under investigation by the Australian bishops conference, and multiple American bishops are trying to ban him from their dioceses after he published a book suggesting the Catholic Church examine the roles that power and sex played in the clergy abuse crisis. Bishop Robinson's book is called "Confronting Power and Sex in the Catholic Church," and there is a good article about his speaking tour in America at Boston Globe online. |
|
Thanks to the behavior of the Roman Catholic Church (and others like it), rational people like the British internet sensation (and former comedian) Pat Condell, use their wit and humor to turn people against not just the Catholic Church, but against all churches, and against Jesus of Nazareth as well. |
![]() contact David@CatholicArrogance.Org This is just one of the many dimensions of ![]() Click on this banner to see the whole picture! |